Difference of Physical Education Teachers Skills viewed from Students Creative Thinking Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/respecs.v5i1.4283Abstract
This study aims to determine the teacher's skills in teaching in terms of students' creative thinking skills. Physical education goals which contain the intellectual, mental, social and emotional dimensions and the use of curriculum 13 as the vehicle to achieve that goal. Curriculum 13 to achieve that goal suppresses 4C namely critical, creative, collaborative and communicative. This type of quasi-experimental research uses a comparative causal design. The study population was all eighth grade students in State Middle School 1 Diwek and MTS State 15 Jombang. The sampling technique in this study used random sampling of classes, a sample of 64 students. Data collection of this study uses the sheet of teaching skills and test thinking of students. The data in this study were analyzed using SPSS 20 and used a significance level of 0.05. The skills of physical education teachers can be seen the teacher's picture in conditioning during the learning process. Based on the results obtained by the PJOK teacher data in SMP N Diwek 1, the score was 83.33%. Whereas physical education teachers at MTs N 15 Jombang get a value of 70% and data analysis shows that the probability value is less than 0.05 which is equal to 0,000 so that the null hypothesis can be withdrawn rejected and the research hypothesis accepted. This means that there are differences in physical education teacher skills in SMP N Diwek 1 with physical education teachers in MTs N 15 Jombang in terms of creative thinking of students.
Keywords:
Learning PJOK, Teacher's skills, Creative thinking skillsDownloads
References
Basuki, B., Nurhasn, N., & Suroto, S. (n.d.). Movement and Sport Activities through Games to enhance the Skils of Creative Thinkung and Quality of Learning Process for Children Aged 14-15.
Butler, J. I., & Griffin, L. L. (2010). More Teaching Games for Understanding. In Human Kinetics (Vol. 4, Issue 1).
Caroll, T. G. (2007). Building a 21st Century U.S. Education System. the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2016). Models of Teaching (Nith Editi). Pustaka Pelajar.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom ’ s Taxonomy : 41(4), 212–219.
Lynch, T., & Soukup, G. J. (2016). “ Physical education ”, “ health and physical education ”, “ physical literacy ” and “ health literacy ”: Global nomenclature confusion. Cogent Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217820
Partnership for 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness A Resource And Policy Guide. (2008). Partnership for 21 St Century Skills.
Rink, J. E., & Hall, T. J. (2008). Research on Effective Teaching in Elementary School Physical Education Physical Education. 108(3), 207–218.
Sani, R. A. (2015). Pembelajaran Saintifik untuk Implementasi 2013. PT Bumi Aksara.
Silverman, S. (2005). Thinking Long Term : Physical Education ’ s Role in Movement and Mobility. 138–147.
Silverman, S., & Mercier, K. (2015). Teaching for physical literacy: Implications to instructional design and PETE. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.03.003
Tough Choices or Tough Times National Center on Education and the Economy. (2007). National Center on Education and The Economy.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21 St Century Skills Learning for Life in Our Times (First Edit). Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Basuki Basuki, Yudi Dwi Saputra, Ilmul Ma’arif , Aditya Harja Nenggar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
1.png)
