E-learning in Belgium: a case study of Mons University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v3i1.7457Abstract
The implementation of e-learning in higher education in some European countries is a real challenge. Academics still face resistance from university authorities to launching e-learning centres because of the costs, but they also do not see the point of investing in an inferior type of didactics (they believe that it is impossible to teach effectively online, only possibly in crisis situations such as a pandemic). It turns out that e-learning in the form of bottom-up initiatives was already being organised many years ago in Belgium, for example, and the results have led university authorities to take an interest in investing in e-learning. The aim of the article is to present the innovations implemented at the Belgian university, with particular regard to open e-learning courses. The research is based on participant observation, interviews with employees from the team introducing e-learning at the Belgian university, as well as on source materials from the visited higher education institution. The publication demonstrates that it is possible to implement professional e-learning from scratch, even without substantial support from the university authorities. The research shows that it is possible to implement effective online courses, targeting lecturers, students and external audiences, thanks to innovators who want to implement modern educational methods, while improving their own skills all the time.
Keywords:
Belgium, E-learning, MOOC, Postpandemic e-learning, Effective online coursesDownloads
References
Balter, O. (2017). Moving Technology-Enhanced-Learning Forward: Bridging Divides through Leadership. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3250
Breslow, L. B., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX‘s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, pp.13-25.
Brzostek-Pawłowska, J. (2020). Zarys ewolucji e-learningu. Technologie, Standardy, Baani. Warszawa. DIG Press.
Chaw, L. Y., & Tang, C. M. (2019). Driving high inclination to complete massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivation and engagement factors for learners. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 17(2), pp. 118–130. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1221333
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Learner engagement in MOOCs: Scale development and validation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), pp. 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12810
Douglas, K. A, Merzdorf, H. E., Hicks, N. M., Sarfraz, M. I., & Bermel, P. (2020). Challenges to assessing motivation in MOOC learners: An application of an argument-based approach. Computers & Education, p. 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103829
Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2021). Lifelong learning and the Internet: Who benefits most from learning online? British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13041
Hew, K. F. (2018). Unpacking the strategies of ten highly rated MOOCs: Implications for engaging students in large online courses. Teachers College Record, 120(1), pp.1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000107
Jansen, D., Schuwer, R., Teixeira, A., & Aydin, C. H. (2015). Comparing MOOC Adoption Strategies in Europe: Results from the HOME Project Survey. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2154
Lee, G., Keum, S., Kim, M., Choi, Y., & Rha, I. (2016). A study on the development of a MOOC design model. Educational Technology International, 17(1), pp. 1–37. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201612359835226.pdf
Lowenthal, P. R., & Hodges, C. B. (2015). In search of quality: Using quality matters to analyze the quality of massive, open, online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2348
Milligan C., Littejohn A., Margaryan A. (2013). Patterns of Engagement in Connectivist MOOCs, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, pp. 149-159.
Moreira, D. P. (2016). From On-Campus to Online: A Trajectory of Innovation, Internationalization and Inclusion. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2384
Pokrzycka, L. (2023). E-learning akademicki. Perspektywa wybranych dyscyplin nauk społecznych, Lublin. UMCS.
Silva, A. P., Lourtie, P., & Aires, L. (2013). Employability in online higher education: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1262
Simpson, O. (2023). Student Support in Online Learning—We Need to Talk About Money. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(4), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7241
Tømte, C. E., Fevolden, A. M., & Aanstad, S. (2017). Massive, Open, Online, and National? A Study of How National Governments and Institutions Shape the Development of MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2751
Wang, Y., & Baker, R. (2015). Content or platform: Why do students complete MOOCs? Journal Of Online Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 17–30. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol11no1/Wang_0315.pdf
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M.J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(4), 5-23.
Zhang W., Zhu C. (2020). Blended learning as a good practice in ESL courses compared to F2F learning and online learning, International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(1), pp. 64-81.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lidia Pokrzycka

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.