Teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting: adapting the teacher theory model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v1i2.2493Abstract
The study aims to examine the teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting as implemented in terms of student interest, learning reflection, direct instruction, learning activities, and student performance. It also aims to identify the contribution of the teacher theory model in adapting the teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting in the area of talented, enthusiastic, adaptability, creativity, honest, effective, and resourceful. The research employs the descriptive quantitative methods and designs to utilize and generalize the result of the opinion, attitude, behaviors of the variable defined in the study. Purposive sampling is also explored in the study since it refers to the expert sampling or judgmental. It is a sample of non-probability. The study comprised One Hundred (100) respondents only. Results show that it encourages, open communication and sincerity of teachers for students to be comfortable in sharing their knowledge and opinion inside the classroom in terms of student interest, provides learning reflection for students to gauge quickly in the understanding of the lesson and teaching content in terms of learning reflection, assesses the teaching concept to modify the lesson as needed in terms of direct instruction, provides a better brainstorming approach to learning activities for students to share their insights and ideas about the lesson in terms of learning activities, aligns the learning instruction and standard in the task to the measurable learning target of the subject in terms of student performance. On the other hand, contribution of teacher model theory shows being patient at all levels in the variety of classroom cultural background, intellectual abilities, and learning styles to balance their own expectations and unique abilities for the learners in the area of teacher as talented, shows that teacher improves classroom behavior, student performance, positive attitude, and lead better evaluation in teaching in the area of teacher as enthusiastic, focuses on the transformation and interdisciplinary learning that equips with technological advancement in the increased roles and functions of the learning process in the area of teacher as adaptable, shows that teaching empowers the opinion and ideas that express unique ways in teaching and active learning relevant for student learners in the area of teacher as creative, shows that teacher speaks the truth by avoiding giving false compliments and honestly correcting mistakes done by the students in the area of teacher as honest, shows that it explores student thinking in efficient learning and delivers the information that lasts for the students’ skills and knowledge in the area of teacher as effective, shows that teaches positive skepticism to students and the ability to look for the development and solution to the learning process in the area of teacher as resourceful. Findings show that there is no significant relationship between the teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting implementation and the contribution of the teacher theory model in adapting the teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting among the respondents.
Keywords:
Teaching and learning intervention, educational setting, learning reflection, direct instruction, adapting the teacherDownloads
References
Abdi, S., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Demartini, G. (2021). Evaluating the quality of learning resources: A learnersourcing approach. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(1), 81-92.
Alazmi, A. A., & Alenezi, A. S. (2020). Exploring the mediating role of trust in principal on the relationship between organizational justice and teacher commitment in Kuwait. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-17.
Allison, L., Waters, L., & Kern, M. L. (2021). Flourishing classrooms: Applying a systems-informed approach to positive education. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(4), 395-405.
Billett, S. (2020). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Routledge.
Binning, K. R., & Browman, A. S. (2020). Theoretical, ethical, and policy considerations for conducting social–psychological interventions to close educational achievement gaps. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 182-216.
Bloom, L. A., & Doss, K. (2021). Using technology to foster creative and critical thinking in the classroom. In Research Anthology on Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students (pp. 553-567). IGI Global.
Burić, I. (2019). The role of emotional labor in explaining teachers' enthusiasm and students' outcomes: A multilevel mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 12-20.
Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., & Ortiz, J. (2020). Integrating critical thinking into the classroom: A teacher’s perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100674.
Carpenter, J. P., Rosenberg, J. M., Dousay, T. A., Romero-Hall, E., Trust, T., Kessler, A., ... & Krutka, D. G. (2020). What should teacher educators know about technology? Perspectives and self-assessments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 103124.
Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers & Education, 157, 103966.
Chafia, S., & Yassamine, K. (2020). The Effect of Time Management Skills on Information Processing, Retention and Recall.
Corwith, A. M. S. (2020). Humanitarian Aid and Resilience: A Study of Rural Nepali Educators' Perspectives on Coping and Adaptability in Recreating an Educational Learning Environment for Their Students after the 2015 Earthquakes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park).
Denieffe, S. (2020). Commentary: Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing: JRN, 25(8), 662.
Faith, L. C., & Pyle, A. (2021, January). Planned Change: Drivers of High Implementation for a Pedagogical Self-Regulated Learning Intervention. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5, p. 297). Frontiers.
Foster, M. K. (2021). Design thinking: A creative approach to problem solving. Management Teaching Review, 6(2), 123-140.
Gaspard, H., & Lauermann, F. (2021). Emotionally and motivationally supportive classrooms: A state-trait analysis of lesson-and classroom-specific variation in teacher-and student-reported teacher enthusiasm and student engagement. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101494.
Gómez, R. L., & Suárez, A. M. (2021). Gaming to succeed in college: Protocol for a scoping review of quantitative studies on the design and use of serious games for enhancing teaching and learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100021.
Gunn, L. (2021). Creative learning: art as a language for students with diverse learning styles.
Haas, C., & Hadjar, A. (2020). Students’ trajectories through higher education: a review of quantitative research. Higher Education, 79(6), 1099-1118.
Hamzah, S. R. A., Kai Le, K., & Musa, S. N. S. (2021). The mediating role of career decision self-efficacy on the relationship of career emotional intelligence and self-esteem with career adaptability among university students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 26(1), 83-93
Huang, N. T., Chang, Y. S., & Chou, C. H. (2020). Effects of creative thinking, psychomotor skills, and creative self-efficacy on engineering design creativity. Thinking skills and creativity, 37, 100695.
Hylén, J. (2021). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges.
Jederlund, U., & von Rosen, T. (2021). Changes in Students’ School Trust as a Reflection of Teachers’ Collective Learning Processes: Findings from a Longitudinal Study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-22.
Kong, S. C., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151, 103872.
Kumar, P. (2020). Need to acquire democratic competency by Teacher Educator in Global Scenario. Available at SSRN 3683468.
Lavy, S., & Naama-Ghanayim, E. (2020). Why care about caring? Linking teachers’ caring and sense of meaning at work with students’ self-esteem, well-being, and school engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103046.
Leite, L. O., Go, W., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2020). Exploring the Learning Process of Experienced Teachers Focused on Building Positive Interactions with Pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-15.
Lin, Y. N., Hsia, L. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Promoting pre-class guidance and in-class reflection: A SQIRC-based mobile flipped learning approach to promoting students’ billiards skills, strategies, motivation and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 160, 104035.
Ma, F., Heyman, G. D., Jing, C., Fu, Y., Compton, B. J., Xu, F., & Lee, K. (2018). Promoting honesty in young children through observational learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 234-245.
Mallillin, L. L. D. (2020). Different Domains in Learning and the Academic Performance of the Students. Journal of Educational System, 4(1), 1-11.
Mallillin, L. L. D. (2021). TEACHER THEORY AND ADAPTABLE MODEL: AN APPLICATION TO TEACHING PROFESSION. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(12).
Mallillin, L. L. D., Cabaluna, J. C., Laurel, R. D., Arroyo, P. A. C., Señoron Jr., T. M., & Mallillin, J. B. (2021). Structural Domain of Learning and Teaching Strategies in The Academic Performance of Students. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(9).
Mallillin, L. L. D., Carag, E. A., Mallillin, J. B., & Laurel, R. D. (2020). Integration of knowledge through online classes in the learning enhancement of students. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 5(1).
Mallillin, L.L.D., et al (2021). Innovation and Integration of 4cs in the Quality of Teaching: Basis for Educational System in the 21st Century. East African Scholars J Edu Humanity Lit, 4(9), 344-354.
Mallillin, L. L. D., Mallillin, J. B., Carag, E. A., Collado, J. B., & Largo, M. G. D. (2020). A framework in online learning process: a guide to educational teaching during covid 19 pandemic. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 5(2).
Mallillin, L. L. D., & Mallillin, J. B. (2019). Competency Skills and Performance Level of Faculties in the Higher Education Institution (HEI). European Journal of Education Studies.
McEntyre, K., & Richards, K. A. R. (2021). Implementing lessons learned through occupational socialization theory to influence preservice teachers’ subjective theories. Sport, Education and Society, 1-13.
McGarr, O. (2021). The use of virtual simulations in teacher education to develop pre-service teachers’ behaviour and classroom management skills: implications for reflective practice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 274-286.
Miller, M. W., Wallace, B., Rockholt, C., Came, D., Pauley, G., Gallo, G., ... & Jeffries-Simmons, T. (2020). Continuous Learning 2020. Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Miralles-Armenteros, S., Chiva-Gómez, R., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A., & Barghouti, Z. (2021). Mindfulness and academic performance: The role of compassion and engagement. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(1), 3-13.
Mockler, N., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2015). Seeking for the unwelcome truths: Beyond celebration in inquiry-based teacher professional learning. Teachers and teaching, 21(5), 603-614.
Mróz, A., & Ocetkiewicz, I. (2021). Creativity for Sustainability: How Do Polish Teachers Develop Students’ Creativity Competence? Analysis of Research Results. Sustainability, 13(2), 571.
Piedade, F., Malafaia, C., Neves, T., Loff, M., & Menezes, I. (2020). Educating critical citizens? Portuguese teachers and students’ visions of critical thinking at school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100690.
Plickers, I. A. A. (2019). Physical Learning Using Model Direct Instruction Assisted Application Plickers to Measure the Understanding of the Concept of Students.
Pollock, J. E., & Tolone, L. J. (2020). Improving student learning one teacher at a time. ASCD.
Rolf, K. R., & Slocum, T. A. (2021). Features of Direct Instruction: Interactive Lessons. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(3), 793-801.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
Sanfo, J. B. M. (2020). A three-level hierarchical linear model analysis of the effect of school principals’ factors on primary school students’ learning achievements in Burkina Faso. International Journal of Educational Research, 100, 101531.
Santangelo, J., Hobbie, L., Lee, J., Pullin, M., Villa-Cuesta, E., & Hyslop, A. (2021). The (STEM) 2 Network: a multi-institution, multidisciplinary approach to transforming undergraduate STEM education. International journal of STEM education, 8(1), 1-15.
Shafait, Z., Khan, M. A., Sahibzada, U. F., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., & Popp, J. (2021). An assessment of students’ emotional intelligence, learning outcomes, and academic efficacy: A correlational study in higher education. Plos one, 16(8), e0255428.
Shibata, N. (2020). Exploring a language learning history: The journey of self-discovery from the perspectives of individual differences. English Language Teaching and Research Journal (ELTAR-J), 2(1), 8-15.
Slocum, T. A., & Rolf, K. R. (2021). Features of direct instruction: Content analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(3), 775-784.
Spencer, D., & Temple, T. (2021). Examining Students' Online Course Perceptions and Comparing Student Performance Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face Classrooms. Online Learning, 25(2), 233-261.
Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The Influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity, Collaborative) Learning Model on Students' Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873-892.
Wiggins, B. L., Eddy, S. L., Wener-Fligner, L., Freisem, K., Grunspan, D. Z., Theobald, E. J., ... & Crowe, A. J. (2017). ASPECT: A survey to assess student perspective of engagement in an active-learning classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar32.
Yurtseven Avci, Z., O'Dwyer, L. M., & Lawson, J. (2020). Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 160-177.
Zhang, Q. (2014). Assessing the effects of instructor enthusiasm on classroom engagement, learning goal orientation, and academic self-efficacy. Communication Teacher, 28(1), 44-56.
Zheng, X., Johnson, T. E., & Zhou, C. (2020). A pilot study examining the impact of collaborative mind mapping strategy in a flipped classroom: learning achievement, self-efficacy, motivation, and students’ acceptance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3527-3545.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Leovigildo Lito D. Mallillin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
