Students’ perception of team-based learning: evidence in Economics

Authors

  • Gemma Abío Universitat de Barcelona
  • Manuela Alcañiz Universitat de Barcelona
  • Marta Gómez-Puig Universitat de Barcelona
  • Luis Ortiz-Gracia Universitat de Barcelona
  • Vicente Royuela Universitat de Barcelona
  • Glòria Rubert Universitat de Barcelona
  • Mònica Serrano Universitat de Barcelona
  • Alexandrina Stoyanova Universitat de Barcelona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v2i2.4203

Keywords:

Active learning, Team based learning, Flipped classroom, Economics, Perceptions

Abstract

Today’s new teaching and learning methodologies in higher education have moved the center from teacher to student and from teaching to learning. Since Team-Based Learning (TBL) is one of the most frequently used active learning methodologies that have emerged, the objective of this paper is to analyze and evaluate students’ perception of this methodology. To that end, first we study the positive and negative aspects of TBL considered by students. Then, we define a synthetic indicator to evaluate the degree of satisfaction of students with this methodology and analyze it according to sociodemographic variables. Finally, we analyze whether there is any correlation between the degree of satisfaction of each student and their individual final grade in global terms. The analysis is performed using a database (which includes information of 657 students) created by merging two datasets: an online questionnaire answered by students, and academic and sociodemographic information of the students who participated in the questionnaire. The main results show that TBL is perceived as a positive methodology, with respect to improving teamwork abilities. Significant differences in several competences were found by age groups, between students with or without a paid job, and depending on the educational attainment of their parents. The students’ perception of TBL regarding motivation and performance during the learning process gives information about the sociodemographic characteristics of the students who will show greater acceptance and appreciation of the introduction of TBL.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abío, G., Alcañiz, M., Gómez-Puig, M., Rubert, G., Serrano, M., Stoyanova, A., & Vilalta-Bufí, M. (2019). Retaking a course in economics: Innovative teaching strategies to improve academic performance in groups of low-performing students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56, 2, 206–216.

Baepler, P. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers and Education, 78, 227-236.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education.

Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the- Classroom/130857/

Bikanga Ada, M., & Foster, M. E. (2023). Enhancing postgraduate students’ technical skills: perceptions of modified team-based learning in a six-week multi-subject Bootcamp-style CS course. Computer Science Education, 33(2), 186-210.

Carr, T., Cox, G., Eden, A., & Hanslo, M. (2004). From peripheral to full participation in a blended trade bargaining simulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00381.x.

Chung, K. (2014). Professors ‘flip’ classrooms, enhance learning. Daily Tar Heel. http://www.dailytarheel.com/article/2014/01/flipped-classrooms-0108.

Conde-Ruiz, J.I. & Ganuza, J.J. & García, M. (2020). Gender gap and multiple choice exams in public selection processes. Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, 235(4), 11-28.

Craig, J. M., Nodeland, B., Long, R., & Spivey, E. (2020). Student Perceptions of Team-Based Learning in the Criminal Justice Classroom. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 31(3), 372-389.

Cronbach, L.J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Crouch, C., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results, American Journal of Physics, 69, 970-977.

Curşeu, P.L., Chappin, M.M.H. & Jansen, R.J.G. Gender diversity and motivation in collaborative learning groups: the mediating role of group discussion quality. Soc Psychol Educ 21, 289–302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9419-5

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class. Science, 332, 862-864.

Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., Eacker, A., Harper, W., Massie, F. S., Power, D. V., ... & Shanafelt, T. D. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and medical student well-being in the United States. Archives of internal medicine, 167(19), 2103-2109.

Espey, M. (2018). Diversity, Effort, and Cooperation in Team-Based Learning. Journal of Economic Education, 49, 1, 8-21.

Fatmi, M., Hartling, L., Hillier, T., Campbell, S., & Oswald, A. E. (2013). The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30. Medical teacher, 35(12), e1608-e1624.

Frame, T.R., Cailor, S.M., Gryka, R.J., Chen, A.M., Kiersma, M.E., & Sheppard, L. (2015). Student perceptions of team-based learning vs traditional lecture-based learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(4), 51.

Hong, T., & Pham, T. (2013). Using group projects as a strategy to increase cooperation among low- and high-achieving students. Higher Education Research and Development, 32, 993-1006.

Jackson, M.W., & Prosser, M.T. (1989). Less lecturing, more learning. Studies in Higher Education, 14, 55-68.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K. (2007). The State of Cooperative Learning in Postsecondary and Professional Settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 1, 15–29.

King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41, 30-35.

Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching More by Lecturing Less. Cell Biology Education, 4, 298-310.

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.

Lage, M.J., Platt, G.J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30-43.

Masters, K. (2012). Student response to team-based learning and mixed gender games in an undergraduate medical informatics course. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 12, 3, 344-351.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual Series in Educational Innovation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

McLaughlin, J.C. (2013). Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, 1-8.

Michaelsen, L.K., & Sweet, M. (2011). Team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 41-51. doi:10.1002/t1.467.

Michaelsen, L.K., Knight, A.B., & Fink, L.D. (2004). Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching. Sterling, Va.: Stylus.

Michaelsen, L.K., Parmelee, D.X., McMahon, K.K., & Levine, R.E. (eds.) (2008). Team-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Guide to Using Small Groups for Improving Learning. Sterling, Va.: Stylus.

Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team‐based learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 2008(116), 7-27.

Midway, S., Robertson, M., Flinn, S., & Kaller, M. (2020). Comparing multiple comparisons: practical guidance for choosing the best multiple comparisons test. PeerJ, 8:e10387. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10387.

Millis, B.J., & Cottell, P.B. (1998). Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty. Phoenix, Arizona: Oryx Press.

Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52, 597- 599.

Nordberg, D. (2008). Group projects: More learning? Less fair? A conundrum in assessing postgraduate business education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 481– 492.

Opdecam, E., Everaert, P., & Van Keer, H. (2014). Preferences for Team Learning and Lecture-Based Learning among First-Year Undergraduate Accounting Students. Research in Higher Education, 55, 400-432.

Park, E.L., & Choi, B.K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68, 749-771.

Pennebaker, J.W., Gosling, S.D., Ferrell, J.D. (2013). Daily Online Testing in Large Classes: Boosting College Performance while Reducing Achievement Gaps. PloS ONE 8, 11, e79774.

Prieto, A., Díaz, D., Montserrat, J., Reyes, E. (2014). Experiencias de aplicación de estrategias de gamificación a entornos de aprendizaje universitario. ReVisión, 7.

Queiruga-Dios, M.A.; Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C., & Montero-García, E. (2019). Problemas-Proyectos Adaptativos y Creativos en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Descripción de la metodología y apreciación de los estudiantes involucrados. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, 23,1-23. 10.7203/realia.23.15567

Remington, T.L., Bleske, B.E., Bartholomew, T., Dorsch, M.P., Guthrie, S.K., Klein, K.C., Tingen, J.M., & Wells, T.D. (2017). Qualitative Analysis of Student Perceptions Comparing Team-based Learning and Traditional Lecture in a Pharmacotherapeutics Course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81, 3, 55.

Roediger, H.L. III, Putnam, A.L., & Smith, M.A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. Edited by: Mestre, J.P., Ross, B.H. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Cognition in Education Book Series: Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 1-36.

Shah, S.Z.A. (2013). The use of group activities in developing personal transferable skills. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50, 297-307.

Shapiro, S.S., & Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52 (3-4), 591-611.

Stephenson, N. S., & Sadler-Mcknight, N. P. (2016). Developing Critical Thinking Skills Using the Science Writing Heuristic in the Chemistry Laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00102a

Strayer, J. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments, 15, 171-193.

Wasserman, L. (2006). All of nonparametric statistics. Springer Texts in Statistics, New York: Springer.

Wilson, S.G. (2013). The flipped classroom: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 193-199.

Yamarik, S. (2007). Does cooperative learning improve student learning outcomes? Journal of Economic Education, 38, 259-277.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-27

How to Cite

Abío, G., Alcañiz, M., Gómez-Puig, M., Ortiz-Gracia, L., Royuela, V., Rubert, G., Serrano, M., & Stoyanova, A. (2023). Students’ perception of team-based learning: evidence in Economics. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 2(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v2i2.4203

Issue

Section

Articles