The Use of Cooperative Learning Method Type of Listening Team to Increase Students’ Learning Outcomes in Social Studies at 4th Grade of Elementary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i4.4051Abstract
Cooperative learning (CL) has a pivotal role in the teaching and learning process to achieve better academic performance using an attractive teaching trait. This study aims at investigating the use of the Cooperative Learning method type listening team, knowing the students’ response and their learning outcomes in a social science subject. The study is conducted at one of the Public Elementary schools in Rangkasbitung. Classroom Action Research was employed in this study. The Cooperative Learning method type of listening team was conducted within 2 cycles. There are 22 students as the subjects of the current study. The data of the study were collected using two research instruments, they are observation and written test. The results of the study revealed that the activities of both teachers and students in the learning process using a Cooperative Learning type listening team improve students’ learning outcomes. The level of students’ learning mastery in the pre-cycle was 24%, in cycle 1 was 48% and in cycle 2 the passing grade reached 79%. While, the activities of teachers and students increased by 75% in the use of cooperative learning methods of the previous team listening and learning outcomes of students also increased, and 75% of the number of students achieved the standard of minimum completeness of mastery learning predetermined. Based on the data findings, it can be highlighted that the CL method type listening team is an effective method to improve both students’ learning outcomes and their activities during the class.
Keywords:
Cooperative learning method type of listening team, learning outcomes, student class IVDownloads
References
A. Wahab, A. (2009). Konsep Dasar IPS. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulfrey, C., & Volpé, Y. (2017). Challenges for cooperative learning implementation: reports from elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673
Casey, A., & Fernandez-Rio, J. (2019). Cooperative Learning and the Affective Domain. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 90(3), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2019.1559671
Chamberlin-Quinlisk, C. (2010). Cooperative learning as method and model in second-language teacher education. Intercultural Education, 21(3), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675981003760432
Chan, K. W. (2014). Cooperative learning in a Hong Kong primary school: perceptions, problems and accommodation. Intercultural Education, 25(3), 216-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.911805
Delgado-García, M., Conde Vélez, S., & Toscano Cruz, M. de la O. (2021). Cooperative learning at university: opinion of students and application of the instrument Cooperative Learning Questionnaire (CLQ). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1932557
Depdiknas. (2006). Undang-undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional No. 20 Tahun 2003. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Erbil, D. G., & Kocabaş, A. (2018). Cooperative Learning as a Democratic Learning Method. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2017.1385548
Ghaith, G. (2004). Correlates of the Implementation of the STAD Cooperative Learning Method in the English as a Foreign Language Classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(4), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367005040866
Gömleksi˙z, M. N. (2007). Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method in teaching English as a foreign language to engineering students (Case of Firat University, Turkey). European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 613-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701433343
Hartono. (2012). Paikem. Riau: Zanafa Publishing.
Healy, M., Doran, J., & McCutcheon, M. (2018). Cooperative learning outcomes from cumulative experiences of group work: differences in student perceptions. Accounting Education, 27(3), 286-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1476893
IGAK, K. W. (2008). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Majid, A. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education 3-13, 43(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.963370
Suprijono, A. (2015). Cooperative Learning. Surabaya: Pustaka Pelajar. Surabaya: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suryanto, A. (2011). Evaluasi pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Umar, A. (2011). Modul Pendidikan Dan Latihan Profesi Guru. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Usmaedi, Bunyamin Maftuh, Hamdan, Siti Nurbayani K, Puji Siswanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work