THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING THE SUBJECTIVE IN LEARNING (SIL) LEARNING MODEL IN IMPROVING THE UNDERSTANDING OF NATURE OF SCIENCE (NoS) SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v10i1.6973Abstract
Understanding the Nature of Science (NoS) is essential because it helps students appreciate, understand and criticize science more effectively. The subjective aspect, which is one aspect of the Nature of Science (NoS), still needs to be better understood among elementary school students. This Research discusses the effectiveness of using the Subjective In Learning (SIL) learning model in increasing understanding of the Nature of Science (N0S). ) subjective aspects of elementary school students. This Research was conducted using a quantitative approach, a pre-experimental research type with a one-group pretest post-test design. The instruments used were questionnaires and interviews. The research location is at a leading private elementary school in Garut Regency, West Java. Based on the Research that has been carried out, the results show that the Subjectivies in Learning (SIL) learning model is effective in increasing students' understanding of the subjective aspect of the Nature of Science (NoS), with an increase of 0.34, which can be included in the medium category. The author recommends that further researchers develop other learning models to increase students' understanding of different aspects of NoS.
Keywords:
learning model subjectives in learning (sil), understanding nature of science (nos) subjective aspectsDownloads
References
Adal, E. E., & Cakiroglu, J. (2023). Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Understanding and Decision Making on Socioscientific Issue through the Fractal Model. In Science and Education (Vol. 32, Issue 2). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00319-1
Adi, Yogi., W. A. (2018). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains pada Guru dan siswa sekolah Dasar. Edukasi: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Artikel Pendidikan, 10(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31603/edukasi.v10i1.1831
Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). On the nature of teaching nature of science: Preservice early childhood teachers’ Instruction in preschool and elementary settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20323
Anggraini, N., Budiyono., P. (2019). Cognitive differences between male and female students in higher order thinking skills Cognitive differences between male and female students in higher order thinking skills. IOP COnfrens Series Journal of Physic. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012006
Barbehön, M. (2022). Policy design and constructivism. In Research Handbook of Policy Design (pp. 104–119). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106606.00014
Creswell, J. (2014). RESEARCH DESIGN (Qualitative, Quantitatif, and Mix Methods Approaches) (J. Young (ed.); fourth). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Gall, J,. Borg, W. (2014). Applying Educational Research: How to Read, Do and Use Research to solve problems of Practice Gall Gall Borg sixth Edition (sixth). PEARSON.
Imran, M. E., & Wibowo, A. (2018). Profil Pemahaman Nature Of Science (NNOS) Di Sekolah Dasar. JKPD (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar), 3(2), 540. https://doi.org/10.26618/jkpd.v3i2.1420
Jahn, R. G., & Dunne, B. J. (2007). Science Of The S Ubjective. 3(2), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2007.03.014
Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2014). Analysis of Nature of Science Included in Recent Popular Writing Using Text Mining Techniques. Science and Education, 23(9), 1785–1809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9703-0
Jumanto, J., & Widodo, A. (2018). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains Oleh Siswa Dan Guru Sd Di Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 2(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.32585/jkp.v2i1.61
Kostøl, K. B., Bøe, M. V., & Skår, A. R. (2023). Nature of Science in Norway’s Recent Curricula Reform: Analysis of the Biology, Chemistry, and Physics Curricula. Science and Education, 32(5), 1561–1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00399-z
Lailiyah, S. (2020). Mathematical literacy skills of students ’ in term of gender differences Mathematical Literacy Skills of Students ’ In Term of Gender Differences. 050019(August 2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995146
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916–929. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-A
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0
Lederman, N., Lederman, J., & Antink-Meyer, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy.
Lestar, Hana., Rahmawati, I. (2020). Pemahaman NoS peserta didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Sains Indonesia, 1(1), 18–25.
Lestari, H., & Widodo, A. (2021). Peranan Model Pembelajaran Nature of Sains Terhadap Peningkatan Pemahaman Sains Siswa Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v7i1.2425
Luo, M., Sun, D., Zhu, L., & Yang, Y. (2021). Evaluating scientific reasoning ability: Student performance and the interaction effects between grade level, gender, and academic achievement level. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(May), 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100899
Martins, M., & Justi, R. (2022). Analysis of the relationships between students’ argumentation and their views on nature of science. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 36(November 2018), 100366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100366
Mccomas, W. F. (2015). The Nature of Science & the Next Generation of Biology Education The Nature of Science & the Next Generation of Biology Education Challenges to Inclusion of NOS in the Classroom This issue of The American Biology Teacher features articles related to the n. 77(7), 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.7.2.THE
Nugraheny, D. C., & Widodo, A. (2021). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Nature of Science Terhadap Pembelajaran Sains. Visipena, 12(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v12i1.1332
Rychnovská, D., Pasgaard, M., & Villumsen, T. (2017). Geoforum Science and security expertise : Authority , knowledge , subjectivity. Geoforum, June, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.010
Wiyanto, M. S., & Asmorobangun, P. W. (2020). Gender Differences of Students’ Writing Ability in Descriptive Text. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 8(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v8i2.2314
Zhu, Z. (2007). Gender differences in mathematical problem solving patterns : A review of literature. Internasional Education Journal, 8(2), 187–203. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012006/pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Nurkamilah, Udin Syaefudin Sa’ud, Ari Widodo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
