THE DEVELOPMENT OF ASSISTED WORKSHEETS DIFFERENTIATION LEARNING BASED ON LEARNING STYLE: HOW GREAT IT CAN HELP STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL UNDERSTANDING ABILITY?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v9i2.4541Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop mathematics differentiation learning worksheets based on learning style and to know the impact for mathematics understanding ability in 4th grade. The method we used was R&D including 10 steps. The instruments were a validation test, questionnaire for teachers and students, and an understanding concept test. Validation and questionnaire data analyzed by descriptive quantitative. Although, mathematics understanding ability data analyzed by difference test and N-Gain test. The results of this study show that the differentiation learning worksheets fit with the criteria. Eligibility validation from experts gets an average of 91%. Practically based on teachers and students’ responses get an average 86%. It means that the learning materials are very valid. The learning materials in experiment class can increase the understanding concept with N-Gain 0,74. We can conclude that with mathematics differentiation learning worksheets can increase mathematics understanding ability.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan LKPD Matematika Berdiferensiasi Gaya Belajar dan mengetahui pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa di kelas IV SD. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian dan pengembangan (RnD) yang terdiri atas 10 langkah. Instrumen pengumpul data meliputi lembar validasi, angket respon guru dan siswa, dan tes pemahaman konsep. Data validasi dan kepraktisan dianalisis secara kuantitatif deskriptif, sedangkan data kemampuan pemahaman matematis dianalisis dengan uji beda dan n-gain. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa LKPD berdiferensiasi yang dikembangkan memenuhi kriteria kelayakan, kepraktisan, dan keefektifan. Validasi kelayakan oleh ahli memperoleh rata-rata skor 91% (sangat layak). Kepraktisan mengacu pada respon guru dan siswa memperoleh rata-rata skor 86% (sangat baik). LKPD berdiferensiasi di kelas eksperimen mampu meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman matematis secara efektif dibanding kelas kontrol dengan n-gain 0,74. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa sesuai gaya belajarnya dapat dipengaruhi oleh LKPD berdiferensiasi.
Keywords:
worksheet, differentiation, conceptual understandingDownloads
References
Abdurrahman et al. (2019). Development and Validation of Open Ended Based on Worksheet for Growing Higher Level Thinking Skills of Students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.445
Anthony, G., Hunter, R., & Hunter, J. (2019). Working Towards Equity in Mathematics Education : Is Differentiation the Answer ? 117–124.
Astuti, D., Kartono, & Wardono. (2018). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematika model pembelajaran JUCAMA berpendekatan PMRI dengan google form sebagai self assessment. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 69–76.
Bakri et al. (2020). Student worksheet with AR videos: physics learning media. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 231–240.
Bardy, T., Holzäpfel, L., & Leuders, T. (2021). Adaptive Tasks as a differentiation strategy in the mathematics classroom: Features from research and teachers’ views. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(3), 26–53.
Batubara, H. H. (2017). Pengembangan media pembelajaran matematika berbasis Android untuk siswa SD/MI. Muallimuna Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 3(1), 12–27.
Beck, D., & Beasley, J. (2021). Identifying the differentiation practices of virtual school teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 2191–2205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10332-y
Bernard, M. (2015). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan penalaran serta disposisi matematik siswa smk dengan pendekatan kontekstual melalui game adobe flash cs 4.0. Infinity Journal, 4(2), 197–222.
Bernard, M., & Senjayawati, E. (2019). Developing the students ’ ability in understanding mathematics and self-confidence with VBA for excel. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 45–56.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction, 4th Edition. New York: Longman Inc.
Dack, H., & Triplett, N. (2020). Novice social studies teachers’ implementation of differentiation: A longitudinal multicase study. Theory and Research in Social Education, 48(1), 32–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1640149
Defitriani, E. (2019). Differentiated Instruction: Apa, Mengapa Dan Bagaimana Penerapannya. PHI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.33087/phi.v2i2.38
Demo et al. (2021). Learning mathematics in an inclusive and open environment: An interdisciplinary approach. Education Sciences, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050199
Ekstam et. al. (2017). The impact of teacher characteristics on educational differentiation practices in lower secondary mathematics instruction. Lumat, 5(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.5.1.253
Eller, A. L., Polka, W. S., & Mete, R. E. (2019). Small-town and rural Idaho elementary teachers’ desired versus current use of differentiated instructional practices. Theory and Practice, 30(2), 61–74.
Frerejean, J., van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Dolmans, D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Visscher, A. J. (2021). Ten steps to 4C/ID: training differentiation skills in a professional development program for teachers. Instructional Science, 49(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09540-x
Gall et al. (2003). Educational Research: an Introduction. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2010). Applying Educational Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
Godor, B. P. (2021). The Many Faces of Teacher Differentiation: Using Q Methodology to Explore Teachers Preferences for Differentiated Instruction. Teacher Educator, 56(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2020.1785068
Hubbard, J., & Livy, S. (2021). Self-study of a mathematics learning consultant: Supporting teachers to plan lessons for implementing differentiation in the classroom. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(3), 148–165.
Leballo, M., Griffiths, D., & Bekker, T. (2021). Differentiation practices in a private and government high school classroom in lesotho: Evaluating teacher responses. South African Journal of Education, 41(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n1a1835
Macanas, G. A., & Rogayan, D. V. (2019). Enhancing elementary pupils’ conceptual understanding on matter through sci-vestigative pedagogical strategy (SPS). Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.22.6.2
Mutambara, L. H. N., Tendere, J., & Chagwiza, C. J. (2020). Exploring the conceptual understanding of the quadratic function concept in teachers’ colleges in Zimbabwe. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112617
Roiha, A. (2021). The 5-dimensional model : A tangible framework for differentiation The 5-Dimensional Model : A Tangible Framework for Differentiation. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 26(20).
Saglam-arslan, A., & Devecioglu, Y. (2010). Student teachers ’ levels of understanding and model of understanding about Newton ’ s laws of motion. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–20.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cucun Sutinah, Muhammad Ghiyats Ristiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
