A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODELS GI, TGT, AND STAD ON ELEMENTARY STUDENTS MATHEMATICAL DISPOSITION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v11i1.12087Abstract
The role of learning models is crucial in achieving educational objectives, particularly in mathematics, which is often perceived as a challenging subject by students. This study examines the comparative effectiveness of learning models in enhancing mathematical disposition while controlling for students’ prior knowledge and gender variables. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design was employed, with the population consisting of elementary schools across Cirebon Regency and a sample of 90 students from three schools. Data collection techniques included a mathematical disposition scale and documentation of students’ academic scores. The results indicate that the cooperative learning models GI (Group Investigation), TGT (Teams Games Tournament), and STAD (Student Teams Achievement Division) have varying impacts on students’ mathematical disposition. The GI model showed the most significant effect, with an average increase of 7.8%. Students’ prior knowledge also played a role, as those with higher initial abilities tended to exhibit better mathematical dispositions. However, no significant differences were found in mathematical disposition between male and female students. This suggests that the GI model can be an effective choice for teachers to foster a positive attitude toward mathematics, especially among students with higher prior knowledge.
Keywords:
Cooperative, Mathematical Disposition, Prior knowledge, GenderDownloads
References
Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353
Atallah, F., Bryant, S. L., & Dada, R. (2021). A research framework for studying conceptions and dispositions of mathematics: A dialogue to help students learn. Research in Highher Education Journal, 7, 1–8.
Azwar, S. (2009). Efek seleksi aitem berdasar daya diskriminasi terhadap reliabilitas skor tes. Buletin Psikologi, 17(1), 28–32.
Casfian, F., Fadhillah, F., Septiaranny, J. W., Nugraha, M. A., & Fuadin, A. (2024). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Berbasis Teori Kontruktivisme Melalui Media E-Learning. Pediaqu : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(2), 636–648. http://repo.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/5510/5/BAB 2.pdf
Colgan, L. (2013). What works? Research into Practice. Student Achievement Division, 14(June), 1–4. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/ESL_math.pdf
Graven, M. (2016). Strengthening maths learning dispositions through ‘math clubs.’ South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v5i3.342
Hodiyanto, H. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem solving terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.15770
Khoirunnisa, R. A., & Rahma, N. A. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Double Loop Problem Solving terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Adaptif dan Disposisi Matematis pada Materi Trigonometri. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 6(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2023.6.2.311-322
Lin, S.-W., & ChunTai, W. (2016). A Longitudinal Study for Types and Changes of Students’ Mathematical Disposition. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1903–1911. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040821
Medyasari, L.T., Muhtarom, & S. (2017). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation Berbantuan Kartu Soal. Aksioma, 8(1), 65–75.
Munaji. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw untuk Meningkatkan Disposisi Matematis Siswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 215–231.
MZ, Z. A. (2013). Perspektif Gender Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama Dan Jender, 12(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.24014/marwah.v12i1.511
Nurdiansyah, N. M., Arief, A., Hudriyah, H., & Hadawiyah, R. (2021). Model Collaborative Learning Inklusif Gender. Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama Dan Jender, 20(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.24014/marwah.v20i2.10685
Pei-qi, L. (2023). Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT) in Cooperative Learning<br /> <div> <br /> </div> Education Journal, 12(5), 231–234. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20231205.16
Retnowati, P., & Ekayanti, A. (2020). Think Talk Write Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa. Sigma, 6(1), 17–25.
Riyani, S. R., & Purnamasari, V. (2024). Analisis Upaya Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Dan Numerasi Peserta Didik Di Sd Negeri Gemah. Islamika: Jurnal Keislaman Da Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 1793–1807.
Romadon, K., Malahati, F., Iskandar, R., & Ramadhan, W. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Awal terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v7i2.3307
Satriana, M., Aminuddin, Salamah, U., Sari, D. M., Herawaty, Sagita, A. D. N., Abubakar, A., & Kasbonati. (2020). The Effects of Team Games Tournament Smart Cards Method to the Handwashing Knowledge with Soap Among 5–6 Years Old Preschoolers. 432(Esic 2019), 72–74. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200417.016
Sutiawan, H., Suyono, & Wiraningsih, E. D. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif think talk write terhadap kemampuan komunikasi dan disposisi matematis ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematika siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika, 13(1), 33–46.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(3). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3205040
Verdianingsih, E. (2017). Self-Esteem Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Eduscope, 03(02), 1–9.
Wijayanto, K. A., & Sujadi, I. (2014). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Teams Games Tournament ( TGT ) dan Team Assisted Individualization ( TAI) Pada Materi KPK Dan FPB Matematika Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri Se-Kecamatan Purwodadi. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 67–76.
Williams, K. L. (2020). Contextualizing Math-Related Strengths and Math Achievement: Positive Math Orientations, Social Supports and the Moderating Effects of Prior Math Knowledge. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(3), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00033-z
Yusa, I. M. D. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group Investigation dengan Penilaian Peta Konsep untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Dasar dan Kritis Siswa. Journal of Education Action Research, 7(3), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v7i3.64698
Zenal Mutakin, T., Tola, B., & Hayat, B. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Menggunakan Framwork TIMSS 2019. Prosiding Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematiika, 225–236.
Zulkarnain, I., & Septhiani, S. (2024). Pengaruh Disposisi Matematis dan Resiliensi Matematis terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Prosiding Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 683–692.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mela Minkhatul Maula, Maulana Maulana, Isrokatun Isrokatun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
