Performance Analysis of Physical Education Teachers Certificated and Not Certificated
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/respecs.v5i1.4672Abstract
This study aims to describe the performance of Physical Education teachers at the unit level of Public Elementary Schools throughout the Kesamben District, Jombang Regency in 2022/2023. This research method uses a type of quantitative research. The subjects in this study were all Physical Education teachers in Gugus I Public Elementary Schools throughout the Kesamben District, Jombang Regency, with a total of 17 teachers. Obtaining the percentage score for each competency is then converted to a value scale of 1, 2, 3, or 4. After that, the values are added up, then converted into a scale of 100. The next step is to determine the criteria for the value obtained ≤ 50 (less), 51-60 ( moderate), 61-75 (fair), 76-90 (good), 91-100 (very good). Based on the results of data analysis, there is a comparison of Physical Education Teachers in Elementary Schools in the Kesamben District, Jombang Regency, who are certified to get the best PKG score with a total score of 81, or get a score of 91 on a scale of 100 with the very good category. The lowest PKG with a total score of 64, or a score of 73 on a scale of 100. While the average PKG score is 76 on a scale of 100, with the (good) category. While those who have not been certified, the highest PKG score is 70. And the lowest PKG score is 66. Meanwhile, the average is 68 in the (sufficient) category. The conclusion in this study is that physical education teachers at SDN Kesamben District, Jombang Regency have significant differences in the results of PKG scores between teachers who have been certified and those who have not been certified. Certified teachers only have deficiencies in professional competency assessment, while teachers who have not been certified have deficiencies in social assessment and competence.
Keywords:
Performance, Physical Education TeacherDownloads
References
Anwar Prabu Mangkunegoro. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Achmad Sanusi. (1991). Studi Pengembangan Pendidikan Profesional Tenaga Kependidikan. Bandung: IKIP Bandung.
Asep Hermawan (2005). Menejemen sumberdaya manusia perusahaaan bandung:Remaja Rosdakarya.
Anwar Prabu Mangkunegoro. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. BumiAksara
Anwar Prabu Mangkunegoro. (2013). Uji Kompetensi dan Penilaian Kinerja Guru. Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung
Buchari Alma. (2010). Guru Profesional. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Pedoman Penghitungan Beban Kerja Guru. Jakarta: Ditjen P2TK Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Penilaian Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Ditjen P2TK
Hadari Nawawi. (2006). Evaluasi dan Manajemen Kinerja di Lingkungan Perusahaan dan Industri. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Hamzah B. Uno dan Nina Lamatenggo. (2012). Teori Kinerja dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hamzah B. Uno. (2007). Profesi Kependidikan: Problema, Solusi, dan Reformasi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Kunandar. (2008). Guru Profesional Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu PendidikanPusat Pengembangan Profesi Pendidik (2012). Buku 2, Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Penilaian Kinerja Guru (PK Guru)
Marihot Tua Efendi Harjandia. (2005). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Masnur Muslich. (2007). Sertifikasi Guru menuju Profesionalisme Pendidik.Jakarta:
Triastanto Ambaryadi. (2010). Kinerja Guru Pendidikan Jasmani yang Lulus Sertifikasi di SMP Negeri se-Kabupaten Banjarnegara berdasarkan Kompetensi. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: FIK UNY.
Nana Sudjana. (2004). Penilaian Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suyatno.(2008). Panduan Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: PT.Indeks.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2010). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Soedijarto. (2008). Landasan dan Arah Pendidikan Nasional Kita. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.
Sedarmayanti. (2001). Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktifitas Kerja. Yogyakarta: Bagian Penerbitan STIE YKPN.
Suyatno.(2008). Panduan Sertifikasi Guru.Jakarta: PT.Indeks.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2010). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suwanto dan Donni Juni Priansa. (2011). Manajemen SDM dalam Organisasi Publik dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Triastanto Ambaryadi. (2010). Kinerja Guru Pendidikan Jasmani yang Lulus Sertifikasi di SMP Negeri se-Kabupaten Banjarnegara berdasarkan Kompetensi. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: FIK UNY.
Tim KKN-PPL UNY. (2012). 101 Tips Menjadi Guru Sukses. UNY: Unit Program Pengalaman Lapangan.
Wibowo. (2011). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Joan Rhobi Andrianto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.