Faktor Evaluasi Usabilitas dalam Sistem e-learning dengan Panduan Tinjauan Sistematik PRISMA

Indonesia

Authors

  • Indah Permatasari Universitas Indo Global Mandiri
  • Peny Meliaty Hutabarat Universitas Indonesia
  • Evi Purnamasari Universitas Indo Global Mandiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31949/jensitec.v9i02.3662

Keywords:

Usabilitas, Kualitas Interaksi, E-Learning, Evaluasi.

Abstract

The usability evaluation of e-learning system is an important stap to understanding the quality of the interaction between the user and the system in supporting the learning process. To understan the current approaches, a systematic review was condusted using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A systematic review was carried out on 6 (six) scientific databases within a certain publication period. After applying various exclusion criteria, there were fifteen documents for further analysis. An analysis of the full text of the selected articles was conducted to see the approach used in evaluating the usability of the e-learning system. The author found as many as 51 factors that became criteria in assessing the usability of e-learning systems. In general, the various existing approaches refer to the two basic approaches that have been offered by previous researchers. The latest approaches in assessing the usability of e-learning systems are still modifications and adjustments from the approaches that have been proposed previously. Modifications were made to adapt to the evaluation context and use of the studied e-learning system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chin, S. P. P., Tsui, E., & Lee, C. S. (2016). Enhancing learning effectiveness by adopting a knowledge-based usability guidelines. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46(1), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2014-0015

DeLone, W. H., & McLean Ephramin R. (2003). info quality, satisfaction, DeLone and McLean Model.pdf. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. http://mesharpe.metapress.com/index/PEQDJK46VY52V4Q6.pdf

Estevez, R., Rankin, S., Silva, R., & Indratmo. (2014). A model for web-based course registration systems. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 10(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-05-2013-0014

Hwang, W., & Salvendy, G. (2010). Number of people required for usability evaluation: The 10±2 rule. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 130–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/1735223.1735255

Journal, I., Interaction, H., & Ibm, J. R. L. (1995). IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires : Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(May), 57–78.

Junus, I. S., Santoso, H. B., Isal, R. Y. K., & Utomo, A. Y. (2015). Usability evaluation of the student-centered e-Learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(4), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2175

Khlaisang, J. (2017). Proposing a new pedagogy-based website design: A usability test with lifelong learners. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1713–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9514-9

Koohang, A., & Du Plessis, J. (2004). Architecting Usability Properties in the E-Learning Instructional Design Process. International Journal on ELearning, 3(3), 38–44. http://www.editlib.org/p/5102

Lavrov, E., Kupenko, O., Lavryk, T., & Barchenko, N. (2013). Organizational approach to the ergonomic examination of e-learning modules. Informatics in Education, 12(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2013.08

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

Lin, H. C. K., Wu, C. H., & Hsueh, Y. P. (2014). The influence of using effective tutoring system in accounting remedial instruction on learning performance and usability. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.052

Lohr, L. L. (2000). Designing the instructional interface. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00057-6

Medina-Flores, R., & Morales-Gamboa, R. (2015). Usability Evaluation by Experts of a Learning Management System. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 10(4), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2015.2486298

Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191729

Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, April, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281

Ouadoud, M., Chkouri, M. Y., Nejjari, A., & Kadiri, K. E. El. (2016). Studying and Analyzing the Evaluation Dimensions of E-learning Platforms Relying on a Software Engineering Approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i01.4924

Oztekin, A., Delen, D., Turkyilmaz, A., & Zaim, S. (2013). A machine learning-based usability evaluation method for eLearning systems. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.003

Permatasari, I. (2022). Pengaruh Aspek Pedagogis dan Interaksi Sistem pada Penilaian Usabilitas Sistem E-Learning. Generic, Universitas Sriwijaya, 14(2), 38–44.

Samuel, R. D., Kim, C. M., & Johnson, T. E. (2011). A study of a social annotation modeling learning system. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.1.f

Sari, A. D., Suryoputro, M. R., Rochman, Y. A., Ulandari, S., & Puspawardhani, E. H. (2015a). Usability Analysis of Laboratory Website Design to Improve Learning Process. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 5504–5511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.703

Sari, A. D., Suryoputro, M. R., Rochman, Y. A., Ulandari, S., & Puspawardhani, E. H. (2015b). Usability Analysis of Laboratory Website Design to Improve Learning Process. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 5504–5511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.703

Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Affective impact of navigational and signaling aids to e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.019

Thowfeek, M. H., & Salam, M. N. A. (2014). Students’ Assessment on the Usability of E-leaming Websites. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141(December), 916–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.160

Ullah, A., Xiao, H., Barker, T., & Lilley, M. (2014). Evaluating security and usability of profile-based challenge questions authentication in online examinations. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1869-0238-5-2

Yusof, A. N. M., & Ahmad, N. L. (2012). An Investigation on the Relationship between Online Distance Learning with Learning Usability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 1066–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.372

Zaharias, P. (2004). Usability and e-learning: the road towards integration. ELearn Magazine, 6(6), 4. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=998337.998345

Zaharias, P., & Koutsabasis, P. (2011). Heuristic evaluation of e-learning courses: A comparative analysis of two e-learning heuristic sets. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211192046

Zaharias, P., & Poylymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a usability evaluation method for e-learning applications: Beyond functional usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802546716

Downloads

Published

2023-05-10

How to Cite

Permatasari, I., Hutabarat, P. M., & Purnamasari, E. (2023). Faktor Evaluasi Usabilitas dalam Sistem e-learning dengan Panduan Tinjauan Sistematik PRISMA: Indonesia. J-ENSITEC (Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Technology), 9(02), 805–810. https://doi.org/10.31949/jensitec.v9i02.3662

Issue

Section

Articles