Faktor Evaluasi Usabilitas dalam Sistem e-learning dengan Panduan Tinjauan Sistematik PRISMA
Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/jensitec.v9i02.3662Abstract
The usability evaluation of e-learning system is an important stap to understanding the quality of the interaction between the user and the system in supporting the learning process. To understan the current approaches, a systematic review was condusted using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A systematic review was carried out on 6 (six) scientific databases within a certain publication period. After applying various exclusion criteria, there were fifteen documents for further analysis. An analysis of the full text of the selected articles was conducted to see the approach used in evaluating the usability of the e-learning system. The author found as many as 51 factors that became criteria in assessing the usability of e-learning systems. In general, the various existing approaches refer to the two basic approaches that have been offered by previous researchers. The latest approaches in assessing the usability of e-learning systems are still modifications and adjustments from the approaches that have been proposed previously. Modifications were made to adapt to the evaluation context and use of the studied e-learning system.
Keywords:
Usabilitas, Kualitas Interaksi, E-Learning, Evaluasi.Downloads
References
Chin, S. P. P., Tsui, E., & Lee, C. S. (2016). Enhancing learning effectiveness by adopting a knowledge-based usability guidelines. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46(1), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2014-0015
DeLone, W. H., & McLean Ephramin R. (2003). info quality, satisfaction, DeLone and McLean Model.pdf. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. http://mesharpe.metapress.com/index/PEQDJK46VY52V4Q6.pdf
Estevez, R., Rankin, S., Silva, R., & Indratmo. (2014). A model for web-based course registration systems. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 10(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-05-2013-0014
Hwang, W., & Salvendy, G. (2010). Number of people required for usability evaluation: The 10±2 rule. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 130–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/1735223.1735255
Journal, I., Interaction, H., & Ibm, J. R. L. (1995). IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires : Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(May), 57–78.
Junus, I. S., Santoso, H. B., Isal, R. Y. K., & Utomo, A. Y. (2015). Usability evaluation of the student-centered e-Learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(4), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2175
Khlaisang, J. (2017). Proposing a new pedagogy-based website design: A usability test with lifelong learners. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1713–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9514-9
Koohang, A., & Du Plessis, J. (2004). Architecting Usability Properties in the E-Learning Instructional Design Process. International Journal on ELearning, 3(3), 38–44. http://www.editlib.org/p/5102
Lavrov, E., Kupenko, O., Lavryk, T., & Barchenko, N. (2013). Organizational approach to the ergonomic examination of e-learning modules. Informatics in Education, 12(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2013.08
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Lin, H. C. K., Wu, C. H., & Hsueh, Y. P. (2014). The influence of using effective tutoring system in accounting remedial instruction on learning performance and usability. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.052
Lohr, L. L. (2000). Designing the instructional interface. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00057-6
Medina-Flores, R., & Morales-Gamboa, R. (2015). Usability Evaluation by Experts of a Learning Management System. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 10(4), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2015.2486298
Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191729
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, April, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
Ouadoud, M., Chkouri, M. Y., Nejjari, A., & Kadiri, K. E. El. (2016). Studying and Analyzing the Evaluation Dimensions of E-learning Platforms Relying on a Software Engineering Approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i01.4924
Oztekin, A., Delen, D., Turkyilmaz, A., & Zaim, S. (2013). A machine learning-based usability evaluation method for eLearning systems. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.003
Permatasari, I. (2022). Pengaruh Aspek Pedagogis dan Interaksi Sistem pada Penilaian Usabilitas Sistem E-Learning. Generic, Universitas Sriwijaya, 14(2), 38–44.
Samuel, R. D., Kim, C. M., & Johnson, T. E. (2011). A study of a social annotation modeling learning system. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.1.f
Sari, A. D., Suryoputro, M. R., Rochman, Y. A., Ulandari, S., & Puspawardhani, E. H. (2015a). Usability Analysis of Laboratory Website Design to Improve Learning Process. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 5504–5511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.703
Sari, A. D., Suryoputro, M. R., Rochman, Y. A., Ulandari, S., & Puspawardhani, E. H. (2015b). Usability Analysis of Laboratory Website Design to Improve Learning Process. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 5504–5511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.703
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Affective impact of navigational and signaling aids to e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.019
Thowfeek, M. H., & Salam, M. N. A. (2014). Students’ Assessment on the Usability of E-leaming Websites. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141(December), 916–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.160
Ullah, A., Xiao, H., Barker, T., & Lilley, M. (2014). Evaluating security and usability of profile-based challenge questions authentication in online examinations. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1869-0238-5-2
Yusof, A. N. M., & Ahmad, N. L. (2012). An Investigation on the Relationship between Online Distance Learning with Learning Usability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 1066–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.372
Zaharias, P. (2004). Usability and e-learning: the road towards integration. ELearn Magazine, 6(6), 4. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=998337.998345
Zaharias, P., & Koutsabasis, P. (2011). Heuristic evaluation of e-learning courses: A comparative analysis of two e-learning heuristic sets. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211192046
Zaharias, P., & Poylymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a usability evaluation method for e-learning applications: Beyond functional usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802546716
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Indah Permatasari, Peny Meliaty Hutabarat, Evi Purnamasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the J-ENSITEC (Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Technology) agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work
