Analysis of Evaluation Models in Physical Education Learning: Systematic Literature review

Authors

  • Andi Hasriadi Hasyim Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Iyan Nurdiyan Haris Universitas Sembilanbelas November, Kolaka, Indonesia
  • Ari Gana Yulianto STKIP Darussalam Cilacap, Cilacap, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31949/ijsm.v4i1.8594

Abstract

Knowledge about evaluation has an important role in overcoming various problems in physical education learning. There are various types of program evaluation models used, and therefore, the aim of this research is to explore and review the application of various program evaluation models that have been carried out in the context of physical education learning. The method used in this research is a literature review. Data was collected from three database sources, namely Google Scholar, Garuda Ristekdikti, and Sinta Journal, using the keywords "program evaluation model" and "physical education". The time span of this research covers the period 2018 to 2022. Data search results show as well as 6 articles from Google Scholar, 1 article from Garuda Ristekdikti, and 8 articles from Sinta Journal, so a total of 15 articles will be analyzed. Based on the research results, it appears that the CIPP evaluation model is more popular and is often used to evaluate physical education learning programs, and this evaluation is generally carried out at the secondary school level.

Keywords:

learning evaluation, physical education, systematic literature review

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananda, R., Rafida, T., & Wijaya, C. (2017). Pengantar evaluasi program pendidikan.

Aneza, I., Inayah, A. N., Nursifah, F., Nursaripah, S., & Laksono, B. A. (2023). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Berbasis Model CIPP (Context Input Process Product Evaluation) di PAUD Kober Nurul Anwar. Jurnal Ilmiah Cahaya Paud, 5(2), 18–32.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: pedoman teoritis praktisi pendidikan.

Bachtiar, R. W. (2016). Model Evaluasi Countenance Stake Menggunakan Pendekatan Analisis Rasch Terhadap Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Kolaboratif. Saintifika, 19(2), 1–10.

Bhakti, Y. B., Tola, B., & Triana, D. D. (2022). AITPO (Antecedent, Input, Transaction, Product, Outcomes): Mixed Model Evaluasi Cipp Dan Countenace Sebagai Pendekatan Evaluasi Program Kampus Mengajar. JURNAL HURRIAH: Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Dan Penelitian, 3(1), 11–24.

Haris, I. N. (2018). Model pembelajaran peer teaching dalam pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani. Biormatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(01).

Haris, I. N. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Dan Efikasi Diri Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sepakbola. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Haris, I., Yulianto, A. G., Ernawati, E., & Akbar, M. (2023). Tingkat Kesulitan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani: Studi Cross Sectional Pada Siswa SMPN 2 Pomala. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 15(2), 130–140.

Kurniawan, A., Sari, M. N., Sianipar, D., Hutapea, B., Supriyadi, A., Rahman, A., Akbar, M. A., & Purba, S. (2022). Manajemen kelas. PT GLOBAL EKSEKUTIF TEKNOLOGI.

Lukum, A. (2015). Evaluasi program pembelajaran IPA SMP menggunakan model countenance stake. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 25–37.

Mustafa, P. S., & Gusdiyanto, H. (2023). Perbandingan Kurikulum Pendidikan Jasmani Antara Indonesia dengan Finlandia: Kajian Review. Biormatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(2), 117–128.

Nuroniyah, S. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen pengukuran sikap tanggung jawab siswa madrasah aliyah. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 6(2), 134–141.

Praptanti, I., & Ernawati, A. (2019). Evaluasi pelaksanaan program gerakan literasi sekolah (GLS) pada sekolah menengah atas negeri dan swasta di wilayah purwokerto kota. Prosiding Seminar Nasional LPPM UMP, 1, 289–296.

Purwadi, D. A., & Erdilanita, U. (2022). Efektivitas Evaluasi Model Countenance dalam Proses Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani. Jurnal Kejaora (Kesehatan Jasmani Dan Olah Raga), 7(2), 104–115.

Raibowo, S., & Nopiyanto, Y. E. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga & Kesehatan pada SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Mukomuko melalui Pendekatan Model Context, Input, Process & Product (CIPP). Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi, 6(2), 146–165.

Risyanto, A. (2016). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dengan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Jasmani. Biormatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(01).

Sari, D. N. (2019). Pengaruh Latihan Menggunakan Video dan Latihan Konvensional Terhadap Kemampuan Footwork Mahasiswa Unit Kegiatan Olahraga Tenis Meja Universitas Negeri Padang. Jurnal JPDO, 2(7), 1–7.

Setiawan, I. M. (2021). Ketersediaan Guru, Sarana dan Prasarana Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan Undiksha, 9(1), 18–24.

Sofyan, D. (2018). Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Kinestetik Melalui Permainan Properti. JOURNAL PROCEEDING, 3(1).

Yulianto, A. G., & Hendrayana, Y. (n.d.). ANALYSIS OF INTENTIONAL APPLICATION OF STRUCTURAL PROGRAMS FOR LIFE SKILLS THROUGH PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS ACTIVITIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF POSITIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT. ASEAN Journal of Sport for Development and Peace, 2(1).

Yulianto, A. G., Hendrayana, Y., & Mahendra, A. (2023). Analysis of Intentionally Structured Programs to Improve Life Skills Through Out of School Activities. JUARA: Jurnal Olahraga, 8(1), 73–89.

Zulfikar, M., Rahman, A., Hasyim, A. H., Haeril, H., & Faozi, F. (2022). Self-evaluation of Physical Education Teacher. Journal of Coaching and Sports Science, 1(2), 48–53.

Downloads

Abstract Views : 58
Downloads Count: 8

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Hasyim, A. H., Haris, I. N., & Yulianto, A. G. (2024). Analysis of Evaluation Models in Physical Education Learning: Systematic Literature review. Indonesian Journal of Sport Management, 4(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.31949/ijsm.v4i1.8594