Physical Education Teachers Viewed from an Economic Perspective: Review Literature Analysis Study

Authors

  • Indrayogi Indrayogi Teacher Professional Program, Majalengka University, Majalengka, West Java, Indonesia
  • Intan Primayanti Sports and Health Education, Faculty of Sports Science and Public Health, Mandalika University of Education, Mataram, NTB, Indonesia
  • Soemardiawan Soemardiawan Sports and Health Education, Faculty of Sports Science and Public Health, Mandalika University of Education, Mataram, NTB, Indonesia
  • Nazalus Syobri Sports and Health Education, Faculty of Sports Science and Public Health, Mandalika University of Education, Mataram, NTB, Indonesia
  • Johan Wahyudi Sports and Health Education, Faculty of Sports Science and Public Health, Mandalika University of Education, Mataram, NTB, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to examine the role of physical education (PE) teachers from an economic perspective through an analysis of literature reviews. In the context of education, PE teachers have an important contribution in shaping students' physical and mental health. However, from an economic perspective, their role is often underappreciated. This study analyzes various related literatures to understand how the role of PE teachers is influenced by economic factors such as salary, education budget, government policies, and socio-economic conditions of the community. The results of the study indicate that financial support and economic rewards for PE teachers have a positive correlation with the quality of education they provide. This study also reveals the need for fairer and more sustainable policies to improve the welfare of PE teachers, so that they can be more effective in carrying out their duties.

Keywords:

Physical education teachers, economic perspectives, salaries, education policies, teacher welfare

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bailey, R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x

Hardman, K., & Marshall, J. J. (2000). The state and status of physical education in schools in international context. European Physical Education Review, 6(3), 203-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X000063001

Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. Routledge.

UNESCO. (2015). Quality physical education (QPE): Guidelines for policy-makers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Siedentop, D. (2002). Content knowledge for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(4), 368-372. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.21.4.368

Tinning, R. (2011). Pedagogy and human movement: Theory, practice, and research. Routledge.

O'Sullivan, M. (2004). Possibilities and pitfalls of a public health agenda for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23(4), 392-401. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.23.4.392

Coulter, M., & Woods, C. B. (2012). An economic analysis of the returns to physical education: Evidence from Ireland. European Physical Education Review, 18(2), 172-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12440022

Published

2024-08-25

How to Cite

Indrayogi, I., Primayanti, I., Soemardiawan, S., Syobri, N., & Wahyudi, J. (2024). Physical Education Teachers Viewed from an Economic Perspective: Review Literature Analysis Study. Indonesian Journal of Sport Management, 4(3). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unma.ac.id/index.php/ijsm/article/view/11109