Exploring the Free Learning Policy: Analysis of National Assessment Implementation Strategies in Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v7i2.9187Abstract
The need for strategies and understanding of the implementation of the National Assessment program in primary schools, especially in primary schools. Problems include suboptimal understanding of assessment goals and methods, school readiness to adopt this program, and challenges in ensuring that assessments carried out can provide an accurate picture of students' literacy and numeracy skills. So the purpose of this study is to answer the research question, namely how the strategy of implementing the national assessment at SD Negeri Baru 02 Pagi. The research method used is qualitative with a phenomenological approach that will provide an in-depth analysis of the implementation of research. The results of the analysis showed significant improvements in literacy and numeracy skills, with the most significant improvements in the ability to interpret and understand text content as well as in the domains of geometry and reasoning skills. This shows that the strategy of active student involvement in learning has had a positive impact in improving students' literacy and numeracy skills. The results obtained through the implementation of strategies that encourage proactive student involvement in the learning process have been shown to be effective in improving literacy and numeracy skills, which are key elements in the National Assessment program. The implications of these findings highlight the strategic role of effective learning strategies in achieving quality educational outcomes, and emphasize the need to apply the right approach in developing learning strategies to support the achievement of better educational goals.
Keywords:
consist of two to five relevant words/phrases seperated with semicolonDownloads
References
Akçay, R. C., & Üzüm, P. A. (2016). University Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes about Freedom of Claiming Educational Rights: Ege University. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 1958–1964. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040905
Bowden, J. L. H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2021). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: a holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647
Broome, J. L. (2013). A Case Study in Classroom Management and School Involvement: Designing an Art Room for Effective Learning. Art Education, 66(3), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2013.11519222
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in Conducting a Scholarly Mixed Methods Study. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dberspeakers/48
Dassanayake, H. C., & Senevirathne, A. (2019). Impact of e-servicescapes on student engagement: mediating impact of experience quality. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2018-0024
Erss, M. (2018). ‘Complete freedom to choose within limits’–teachers’ views of curricular autonomy, agency and control in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1445514
Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in School and Out-of-School Contexts: A Multidimensional View of Engagement. 50(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.201
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning : A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating To Achievement. University of Auckland.
Indarta, Y., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., Samala, A. D., Riyanda, A. R., & Adi, N. H. (2022). Relevansi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dengan Model Pembelajaran Abad 21 dalam Perkembangan Era Society 5.0. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(2), 3011–3024. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2589
Kaharuddin. (2021). Equilibrium : Jurnal Pendidikan Kualitatif : Ciri dan Karakter Sebagai Metodologi. 1. http://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/equilibrium
Kemendikbud. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia 2023. https://raporpendidikan.kemdikbud.go.id/login
Lomotey, C. F. (2021). Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics English Language Education as Practice of Freedom in Ghana: An Analysis of Teachers’ Views and Opinions. Jurnal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal
Maamin, M., Maat, S. M., & Iksan, Z. H. (2022). The influence of student engagement on mathematical achievement among secondary school students. Mathematics, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10010041
Martins, D., & Carvalho, C. (2018). Teachers’ feedback and educational self of institutionalized youngsters: A possible dialog? In Cultural Psychology of Education (Vol. 8, pp. 93–106). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98602-9_6
Nilson, C., Fetherston, C. M., McMurray, A., & Fetherston, T. (2013). Creative arts: An essential element in the teacher’s toolkit when developing critical thinking in children. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n7.4
Ozer, B. (2013). Students’ perceptions regarding freedom in classroom. Anthropologist, 16(3), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2013.11891381
Park, M., & Sung, Y. K. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions of the recent curriculum reforms and their implementation: What can we learn from the case of Korean elementary teachers? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.756391
Priestley, M., & Philippou, S. (2018). Curriculum making as social practice: complex webs of enactment. In Curriculum Journal (Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. 151–158). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1451096
Rachman, F., Taufika, R., Kabatiah, M., Batubara, A., Pratama, F. F., & Nurgiansah, T. H. (2021). Pelaksanaan Kurikulum PPKn pada Kondisi Khusus Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5682–5691. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1743
Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Rahayuningsih, Y. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6313–6319. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3237
Roohi, T., Qureshi, N., & Butt, I. H. (2022). A Study On University Students’ Perceptions Regarding Democratic Classroom Environment. Gomal University Journal of Research, 38(03), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-38-03-06
Schneider, B., Krajcik, J., Lavonen, J., Salmela-Aro, K., Broda, M., Spicer, J., Bruner, J., Moeller, J., Linnansaari, J., Juuti, K., & Viljaranta, J. (2016). Investigating optimal learning moments in U.S. and finnish science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21306
Shara, A. M., Andriani, D., Ningsih, A. W., & Shinoda, K. (2020). Correlating Reading Literacy And Writing Literacy In Junior High School Pematangsiantar. Journal of English Education, 5(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.31327/jee.v5i2.1249
Siddiqi, A. (2019). Mediating role of students’ engagement to their classes: An experience from higher education in Pakistan. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-04-2018-0017
Smith, Jonathan. A., & Osborn, M. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological Analysis.
Sumarsih, I., Marliyani, T., Hadiyansah, Y., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Penggerak Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 8248–8258. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3216
Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
Suratno, J., Sari, D. P., & Bani, A. (2022). Kurikulum dan Model-Model Pengembangannya. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Matematika, 2(1), 67–75.
Tikkanen, L., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2020). Lessons learnt from a large-scale curriculum reform: The strategies to enhance development work and reduce reform-related stress. Journal of Educational Change, 21(4), 543–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09363-1
van der Ploeg, P. (2016). Dewey versus ‘Dewey’ on democracy and education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 11(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197916648283
Vhalery, R., Setyastanto, A. M., & Leksono, A. W. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka: Sebuah Kajian Literatur. Research and Development Journal of Education, 8(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v8i1.11718
Widya Ningsih, A., May Shara, A., Andriani, D., & Kisno. (2021). Reading Duration And Financial Literacy In Vocational High School. Jurnal Education and Developments , 9(1), 577–583.
Wiggins, G. (2009). Understanding by Design.
Wijaya, H. (2018). Analisis Data Kualitatif Model Spradley (Etnografi).
Yamin, M., Harapan Bima, S., & Pendidikan Mandalika, U. (2020). Pembangunan Pendidikan Merdeka Belajar (Telaah Metode Pembelajaran). Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 6(1), 126–136. http://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JIME/index
Yuen, T. W. W., Cheung, A. C. K., & Wong, P. M. (2012). A study of the impact of the first phase of the curriculum reform on student learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(7), 710–728. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541211263782
