Eksplorasi Kesiapan Guru Sekolah Dasar Generasi Milenial-Z Menghadapi Pendidikan Society 5.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v7i1.8820Abstract
The era of society 5.0 has been entered by many developed countries. Indonesia, as a developing country, also has the same opportunity to enter the era of society 5.0. Therefore, an approach through the education system needs to be done, especially in preparing teachers in Indonesia. Millennial teachers born in 1981-2000 are future teachers and hope for Indonesia. They are the demographic bonus and the largest productive age group in Indonesia. This generation of teachers will face the education system in the era of society 5.0. This study explores the results of the self-reflection of millennial elementary school teachers on their readiness to face the education system in the period of society 5.0, specifically on technology mastery and students' understanding ability. Data were collected through unstructured interviews with 6 primary school teachers at millennial age in different schools to help them reflect on themselves and then analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results show that the readiness of elementary school teachers at the millennial age in terms of mastering technology is based on three self-conditions, namely self-confidence, the adaptability, and is relied on by colleagues. These three conditions of self in terms of mastery of technology are interconnected with each other. Meanwhile, in terms of student's ability to understand students, their self-readiness is based on two conditions, namely understanding one's own constraints in order to understand students and finding ways to relate to students. This research is limited to only two conditions, namely mastery of technology and the ability to understand students, which are included in teachers' pedagogic and professional competencies. This study also recommends several future teacher professional development research practices.
Keywords:
Teacher Readiness, Millennial-Z Teachers, Society 5.0, Technology , Students' Understanding AbilityDownloads
References
Allan, M. (2007). Millennial teachers: Student teachers as users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 3(2), 16-29. Open Campus, The University of the West Indies, West Indies. Retrieved September 29, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/42361/.
Anwas, O. M. (2013). Kontribusi pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi di daerah tertinggal (Contribution of information and communication technology utilization in the underdeveloped area). Jurnal Teknodik, 018-028. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v17i3.559
Azam, F., Omar Fauzee, M. S., & Daud, Y. (2014). A cursory review of the importance of teacher training: A case study of Pakistan. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(6), 912-917. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.21.06.21574
Bartz, D., Thompson, K., & Rice, P. (2017). Enhancing the effectiveness of millennial teachers through principals using performance management. In National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal (Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 1-9).
Barhate, B., & Dirani, K. M. (2022). Career aspirations of generation Z: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 139-157. DOI 10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0124
Benítez-Márquez MD, Sánchez-Teba EM, Bermúdez-González G and Núñez-Rydman ES (2022) Generation Z Within the Workforce and in the Workplace: A Bibliometric Analysis. Front. Psychol. 12:736820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736820
Cilliers, E. J. (2017). The challenge of teaching generation Z. PEOPLE International Journal of Social Sciences. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/158991/2/PSV3I1188198.pdf
Dewi. (2022). Komunikasi Pribadi
Deguchi, A., Hirai, C., Matsuoka, H., Nakano, T., Oshima, K., Tai, M., & Tani, S. (2020). What is society 5.0. Society, 5, 1-23.
DeVaney, S. A. (2015). Understanding the millennial generation. Journal of financial service professionals, 69(6).
Donnison, S. (2007). Unpacking the millennials: A Cautionary Tale for Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2007v32n3.1
Elliott, K. M., Hall, M. C., & Meng, J. G. (2008). Student technology readiness and its impact on cultural competency. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal (CTMS), 4(6), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.19030/ctms.v4i6.5555
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33-54. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/440358389.pdf
Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 27(5), 47-50.
Giray, L. (2022). Meet the Centennials: Understanding the Generation Z Students. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews (IJSASR), 2(4), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2022.26
Hakim, S. (2021, Oktober 21). Indonesia optimis memasuki memasuki masyarakat 5.0. Antara. Diakses dari https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2472473/indonesia-optimistis-memasuki-masyarakat-50
Huriyatunnisa, A. (2022). Penerapan adaptasi teknologi bagi guru sekolah dasar dalam menunjang pembelajaran dalam jaringan (Daring) di masa Pandemi. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 3163-3173. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2548
Indonesia baik. (2019) Infografis: yuk kenalan dengan milenialIndonesia.. Diakses pada Januari 2022 dari https://indonesiabaik.id/infografis/yuk-kenalan-dengan-millenial-indonesia 2019).
Iorgulescu, M. C. (2016). Generation Z and its perception of work. Cross-Cultural Management Journal, 18(01), 47-54. https://www.seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/CMJ2016_I1_6.pdf
Janawi, J. (2019). Memahami karakteristik peserta didik dalam oroses pembelajaran. Tarbawy : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 68 - 79. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v6i2.1236
Kail, R.V & John C. Cavanaugh. 2010. Human development; A life-span view. USAr: Wadsworth Cangage Learning.
Kementrian Pemberdayaan Perempuan & Perlindungan Anak. (2018). Statistik gender tematik : Profil Generasi Milenial Indonesia. Diakses dari https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/lib/uploads/list/9acde-buku-profil-generasi-milenia.pdf
Kurino, Y. D., & Herman, T. (2023). Improving the Mathematical Understanding of Elementary School Students Through Problem-Based Learning and an Ethnomathematical Perspective. Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-060-2_38
Layton, D. L. (2015). Perceptions of millennial teachers' commitment to teaching as a career. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1202
Litbang Kemdikbud. (2018). Infografis PISA 2018. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Diakses dari https://simpandata.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/s/BTKR4cP76DK3pqM
Mau, C. (2022). Analisis kesiapan technological, pedagogical, content knowledge guru dalam pembelajaran daring di era pandemiCovid-19. LEARNING: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 2(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v2i2.1203
Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study (Vol. 2, pp. 214-253). The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods.
Masami, H. (2021). Society 5.0 and education in Japan. In Educational Innovation in Society 5.0 Era: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 1-6). Routledge.
Mike.(2022). Komunikasi Pribadi
Meliyanti, D. S. N., & Yonanda, D. A. (2018). Model Discovery Learning Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228884984.pdf
Neolaka, Grace. (2021). Readiness of PSTE students to become elementary school teachers (Self reflection study). International Journal of multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. 8(2), 385-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i2.2352
Nurdiana, W., & Harsoyo, R. (2021). Mengukur integritas kurikulumkurilumum pendidikan Indonesia dalam menghadapi era society 5.0. TABYIN: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ISLAM, 3(02), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.52166/tabyin.v3i02.148
Novianingsih, Y. (2017). Implikasi pemahaman guru tentang perbedaan individual peserta didik terhadap pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan.
Octavia, S. A. (2021). Profesionalisme guru dalam memahami perkembangan peserta didik. Deepublish.
Papalia, D.E., Sally , W., & Ruth , D.F. (2008). Human development (10th Ed.). Singapore: Mc Graw Hill
Rara, R. (2020). Memahami karakter siswa. Staccato, 17(214), 13-15.
Rahma, D.A.,Winarni, R., & Winarno. (2020, September) The challenges & readiness of elementary school teachers in facing society 5.0 through online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. In 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2020) Article No:33, pages 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3453743 (online 25 april 2021)
Schuman, Marjorie. (2019). Inquiring deeply about self refelction. Diakses dari www.drmarjorieschuman.com
Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace?. California Management Review, 61(3), 5-18. https://cmr.berkeley.edu/assets/documents/sample-articles/61-3-schroth.pdf
Siburian, S. N. R., & Mahmud, Y. S. (2022). Primary school teacher’s perception of game-based learning in online learning: The advantages and challenges. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 5(2), 116-132. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v5i2.8694
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. John Wiley & Sons.
Sudibjo, N., Lusiana I., and Harsanti, H.G.R. Harsanti (2019). Characteristics of learning in the era of industry 4.0 and society 5.0. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 372(.1) : 276-278.
Supendi, A., & Nurjanah, N. (2020). Society 5.0: Is it high-order thinking?. International Conference on Elementary Education, 2(1), 1054-1059. Retrieved from http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/icee/article/view/716
Walker, K. L. (2009). Excavating the millennial teacher mine. NASSP Bulletin, 93(1), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636509336278